TechCrunch

August 21, 2015

Google data center loses data following four lightning strikes


Google must have done something to anger the gods, for they have blasted one of Google’s European data centers with lightning not once, not twice, not thrice, but four times. The incident was serious enough that the data center actually lost some data, which is exactly what data centers are supposed to avoid.
This incident occurred at Google’s europe-west1-b data center in Belgium on August 17th. This data center houses a variety of content, but the affected disks were handling Google Compute Engine (GCE) instances. The GCE service allows businesses to store data and run virtual computers in the cloud. After the four lightning strikes, some of these drives started returning I/O errors in their GCE instances. At the height of the calamity, about 5% of the disks in the data center were experiencing I/O errors. Google was able to restore many of the drives to working condition and salvage the data, but 0.000001% of the data in europe-west1-b was irrecoverably lost.
Big data centers have systems in place to prevent data loss in the event of electrical interference, and Google is obviously no exception. However, four successive lightning strikes on the electrical systems of its data center pushed the buffering and backups to their limits. The servers have battery backups, and the building itself has a full auxiliary power system. Google says these both flipped on as expected to prevent damage to the disks. However, some recently written data was stored on systems that were more susceptible to power failure or repeated battery drain. This would be the 5% of originally affected storage.



Google says it is already in the process of transitioning all its storage hardware away from the configuration that made this failure possible, and most of it is already running on the new system. That’s why only a small fraction of GCE instances were affected. So I guess the good news is that even four lightning strikes on the data center’s power system wasn’t enough to affect most of the disks google is running. If this had happened a few months down the line, there might not have been any negative impact.
That might not be comforting to the handful of customers who permanently lost data in their GCE instances. While Google accepts full responsibility for the failure, it also points out that GCE is by its nature tied to a single data center. Customers who are particularly worried might want to use GCE snapshots and Google Cloud Storage for geographically independent systems.

August 19, 2015

Intel Core i5 vs. Core i7: Which processor should you buy?





Whether you’re building your next PC or shopping for a new computer online, one of the questions that comes up from time to time is whether the Intel Core i5 or Core i7 is a better bargain. The short answer, “It depends,” isn’t all that helpful, so we’ve broken the data out in more detail and for both mobile and desktop processors. Here’s what you need to know.

Mobile Core i5 vs. Mobile Core i7

Because Intel has launched a reasonable set of SKUs for its 5th generation (Broadwell) hardware, we’ll use those chips for comparing the Core i7 vs. Core i5 stack. All of Intel’s mobile Core i5 processors are dual-core chips with Hyper-Threading, going right back to Sandy Bridge. What distinguishes modern 5th generation Core i5s is their TDPs — Intel offers Broadwell in 15W, 28W, and a single 47W SKU. That chip, the Core i5-5350H is also capable of addressing 32GB of RAM and offers Intel’s Iris Pro 6200 solution based on Crystal Well.

Intel's Core i5 mobile lineup (Broadwell)

Intel’s Core i5 mobile lineup (Broadwell)
Here are the features that separate mobile Core i5 and Core i7 processors:
More cores: Many of Intel’s Core i7 processors are quad-core chips with Hyper-Threading enabled. This isn’t universal, however, and the company does offer five dual-core + Hyper-Threading SKUs.

Higher clocks: Intel’s dual-core mobile Core i7 chips typically have higher clock speeds than their Core i5 counterparts, even at the same TDP. The fastest dual-core Core i7 at 15W TDP is the Core i7-5600U, which runs at 2.6GHz base and 3.2GHz standard. The fastest Core i5 at 15W is the Core i5-5300U, which has a base clock of 2.3GHz and a max clock of 2.9GHz. The GPU on the Core i7-5600U is clocked 50MHz faster as well.

More cache: Core i7 chips carry either 6MB or 4MB of cache. Core i5 chips have 3MB, except for the Core i5-5350H, which has 4MB.

More addressable memory: Most of the Core i7 chips are limited to 16GB, like the Core i5, but there are four exceptions. The Core i7-5850HQ, 5950HQ, 5750HQ, and 5700HQ are all capable of addressing up to 32GB of RAM.
One important thing to note, however, is that how much performance you get out of a Core i5 vs. a Core i7 will depend a great deal on your laptop’s cooling solution and whether or not the chip can handle its own heat output. We’ve previously discussed how Intel gave OEMs more freedom to define their own TDP targets and skin temperatures, but this creates scenarios in which buying a faster Core M can actually result in worse performance as the chip hits its thermal trip point and down-throttles to keep cool.
Intel's highest-end Iris Pro graphics are available in both Core i5 and Core i7 mobile SKUs

Intel’s highest-end Iris Pro graphics are available in both Core i5 and Core i7 mobile SKUs
We can’t point to specific instances where this has tilted performance between Core i5 and Core i7 chips, but it’s likely to create at least a little “slosh” between the two core families. Generally speaking, if you truly want to emphasize low power, pick the CPU that has lower base and turbo clocks. Intel historically defined TDP as “The CPU’s average power consumption when running typical workloads over a period of time.” A chip with more headroom is a chip that’ll hit its throttle point faster.

Desktop Core i5 vs. Desktop Core i7

Because Intel has only launched a handful of Core i5 and i7 desktop parts, for now we’ll focus on the 4th generation cores (Haswell). One significant difference between the desktop and mobile markets is that all but one of Intel’s 23 Core i5 SKUs offer four cores, but no HyperThreading. Intel’s Core i5-4570T is the single exception to this — it’s a dual-core + HyperThreading chip. Another difference between the mobile lineup vs. the desktop cores is that the desktop versions of both the Core i5 and Core i7 officially top out at 32GB of addressable memory.
In fact, many of the differences we observed between mobile parts don’t apply to desktop hardware. The i7 family still carries more L3 cache (8MB, save for the Core i7-4770R, which has 6MB), as compared to the Core i5 family, which has 6MB of cache on every chip except for the Core i5-4570R, 4570 and 4670R, which have just 4MB. Clock speeds are a mixed bag — while the fastest Haswell Intel manufacturers is the Core i7-4790K at 4GHz base clock and 4.4GHz Turbo, the Core i5-4690K is clocked at 3.5GHz base and 3.9GHz Turbo — essentially equal to the Core i7-4770K.
Both the Core i3 and Core i5 families use Intel HD Graphics 4600 solution with the same 350MHz base clock and 1.2GHz maximum clock. Apart from Hyper-Threading and some small cache differences, the Core i5 and Core i7 are quite similar, with overlapping frequency ranges and feature sets. Support for Intel’s TSX-NI instructions is only available on one Core i5 SKU, but only two Core i7’s offer the capability.
Similarly, Intel only offers vPro on 13 of the 23 Core i5 SKUs, compared to 9 of the 12 Core i7 SKUs — but if you want vPro on a Core i5, you can get it.

August 17, 2015

Brandywine.Build One Like This!

Asus Lays Claim to First USB 3.1 Gen 2 Certified Motherboard



Asus is in full brag mode over the claim that its TUF Sabertooth Z97 Mark 2/USB 3.1 is the world's first motherboard to achieve SuperSpeed USB 10Gbps certification for USB 3.1 Gen 2 data transfer speeds.
According to Asus, its Z97 Sabertooth board had to pass a series of tests set forth by the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF). It's not just a raw speed thing -- the certification process also includes signal quality checks, stress tests, and sustained transmission capabilities.
"USB-IF certification is a proven testing and evaluation process that is absolutely necessary for product interoperability and reliability," said Jeff Ravencraft, USB-IF President and COO. "As the next generation of USB technology hits the market, we strongly encourage consumers to look for USB-IF-certified products, such as the ASUS TUF Sabertooth Z97 Mark 2/USB 3.1 motherboard, to ensure the best possible user experience."
It's a Generational thing
When shopping a motherboard or system with USB 3.1 listed on the spec sheet, be sure that it's a Gen 2 spec if you want the fastest speed available. It's an important distinction, and somewhat confusing, as USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 Gen 1 are basically the same thing. Or in USB-IF's words (PDF), "USB 3.1 Gen 1 and USB 3.0 terms are synonymous" -- both top out at 5Gbps. That's still a huge gain over USB 2.0 (480Mbps), but only half of USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps), which is what many people think of when they see USB 3.1.
  • USB 2.0: 480Mbps (60MB/s)
  • USB 3.0: 5Gbps (625MB/s)
  • USB 3.1 Gen 1: 5Gbps (625MB/s)
  • USB 3.1 Gen 2: 10Gbps (1,250MB/s)
A real world example of this is Apple's Retina Macbook, the one with a single USB 3.1 Type-C connector and no other ports. Even though it sports a fancy Type-C connector and is labeled as USB 3.1, it's a Gen 1 spec, so really it's USB 3.0 in a pretty dress or spiffy suit.

USB Table
 

Asus TUF Sabertooth Z97 Mark 2/USB 3.1
USB shenanigans aside, the Sabertooth Z97 is a "military grade" motherboard for socket LGA 1150 processors. It has four DIMM slots supporting up to 32GB of DDR3-1866 memory, two PCI-E 3.1 x16 slots, a single PCI-E 2.0 x16 slot, three PCI-E x1 slots, half a dozen SATA 6Gbps ports, two rear USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports, two rear USB 3.0 ports, four rear USB 2.0 ports, and a host of other features.
The board is available now for $175(Kshs.19,000)

August 16, 2015

Samsung mass-produces 256Gb 3D vertical NAND chips




Samsung Electronics has begun mass production of 256-gigabit 3D vertical NAND (V-NAND) flash memories, clearing the way for higher-capacity memory that doesn't take up more room.

The memory is built on 48 layers of three-bit multi-level-cell (MLC) arrays and offers 32 gigabytes of data storage on a single chip. It doubles the density of conventional 128Gb NAND flash chips and consumes at least 30% less power than the previous Samsung chip, the company said Tuesday.
Smaller than a fingertip, Samsung's third generation V-NAND flash memory follows the second-generation chip, which featured three bits per cell and 32 vertically stacked cell layers.
In contrast to planar NAND, Samsung's V-NAND incorporates a 3D Charge Trap Flash (CTF) structure of 48 stacked array layers, like a miniature skyscraper. The arrays are connected electrically through 1.8 billion holes punched through them. Each chip has more than 85.3 billion cells, each storing three bits of data.


Samsung said it plans to make the chips for enterprise and data storage users as well as to promote the adoption of terabyte-grade SSDs (solid state drives). In June, Samsung announced a 2TB SSD in a 2.5-inch form factor for laptops and desktops.
The 850 Pro and 850 EVO SSDs included 3D V-NAND technology and doubled the capacity of their predecessors, with 120GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB and 2TB models

August 13, 2015

Origin Millennium (2014) PC.Build One Like This!




Millennium desktop, which liquid-cools the processor and overclocks it to 4.5 GHz. That’s 1.5 GHz higher than the stock model’s base clock.

Origin didn’t stop there. They’ve paired the processor with three Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 video cards, 16GB of DDR4 RAM, and an ASUS X99-Deluxe motherboard.A large side panel window, and a complex, remote-controlled LED lighting system puts the tower’s enthusiast chops on full display. It boasts a stealthy, unassuming look. Turn the LEDs on, and it’s Superman. Turn them off, and it’s Clark Kent.

Metal and plastic are used in the Millennium’s chassis. The former feels premium and sturdy, but the latter is a let down. A few build quality issues can be found along the top panel, where plastic is used to form a series of scoops and dips that enhance the rig’s visual appeal.

They look like handles, but they’re actually flimsy. The system even ships with big red labels warning users that these are “NOT A LIFT POINT.” Design students should take note. If it’s not a handle, don’t make it look like one.

The top of the system also offers excellent connectivity. Here, we found four USB 3.0 ports, and individual headphone/microphone jacks. Fan control knobs, and the usual power and reset buttons are present too. Many competitors have just two forward-facing USB ports that may or may not support USB 3.0 speeds.

Around back, there’s an incredible array of ports, including 10 additional USB 3.0 connectors, two USB 2.0, two Ethernet jacks, 5.1 audio, and antenna connections for the motherboard’s built-in Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. The three GTX 980s each provide three DisplayPort, one HDMI 2.0, and one DVI.

Note, though, that not every video output can be used simultaneously. Nvidia’s drivers currently support up to four monitors at 4K. That cap does not increase when extra cards are installed.

August 12, 2015

VADirect X99 Gaming System.Build One Like This!

custom case doesn’t come free, though, which is why many gaming PCs have an eye-watering price. AVADirect takes a different approach, building systems to order from off-the-shelf parts. They’re like a friend who builds computers charging you to put one together, and delivering it to you when they’re done. An incredibly talented friend, with access to the sweetest components.
In theory, this approach offers more bang for your buck, and the X99 Gaming System we received was configured to prove that point. It arrived with an octa-core Intel Core i7-5960X, which has a base clock of 3.0GHz, and 16GB of Corsair DDR4 RAM. It also had a pair of EVGA Superclocked GTX 980s, which is what you’ll need if you want to game 4K. For storage, AVADirect included a one terabyte Samsung 850 EVO SSD, and a two terabyte Western Digital Black drive.
That’s pretty close to the Origin Millennium from late 2014, and the Falcon Northwest Mach V, though those machines boasted a third video card. The AVADirect system is cheaper than both of them, too, but whether it can hold its own in a world of beautiful custom-built PCs remains to be seen.







Processor Model LGA 2011-v3 Core i7-5960X
Manufacturer: Intel
Speed: 3 GHz
Cores: 8 Cores
64-bit: Yes
16GB of Corsair DDR4 RAM
Graphics Model: GeForce GTX 980 SuperClocked ACX 2.0
Manufacturer: EVGA
VRAM: 8 GB
Storage type: SSD
Size: 2TB
Speed: 520 Mb/s
Power Supply: Corsair AX1200i PSU


The Corsair 760T case sits over 22 inches tall, and weighs just under 25 pounds before there are any parts in it. It’s much larger than your standard desktop tower, though it’s actually smaller and lighter than competing full-tower PCs from Origin and Falcon Northwest.

Top-shelf performance

At the core of the AVADirect X99 Gaming System is a top-of-the-line Intel Core i7-5960X, an octa-core processor with a 3GHz clock speed, and 3.5GHz Turbo Boost. Backing it up is 16GB of Corsair memory, accompanied by a pair of super-clocked EVGA GTX 980s in an SLI configuration for a total of 8GB of VRAM. For storage, AVADirect included a one terabyte Samsung 850 EVO SSD, and a two terabyte Western Digital Black drive.